CHALLENGE
PTI received an opportunity to process
a high-density crystalline material that several other processors
had attempted
and failed to process to the correct particle size with an
acceptable yield. Due to customer proprietary status, we
cannot disclose the type of material.
The raw material was provided in blocks of
approximately 10-15 lb. each. The customer requested a finished
product particle size of minus 100 mesh (150 micron) plus 270
mesh (53 micron).
|
SOLUTION
PTI's approach is a multistage process involving
more than one type of mill. Step one is to reduce the large
blocks of feedstock to minus 20 millimeter size using a jaw
crusher. The jaw-crushed material is further reduced to minus
3 millimeter size, using a hammer mill fitted with boron hard
faced hammers. The hammer-milled material is subsequently passed
through an opposed-jet mill with an integral vane type classifier
further reducing particle size to approximately 80% minus 100
mesh. In the next stage, jet milled material is passed through
a vibratory screen, producing three fractions including undersized
fines, product to size, and oversized coarse material.
Finally, the oversized coarse fraction is
re-milled and screened to produce additional product at the
target size. This multi-step process is a custom approach in
size reduction for a particular customer with a challenging
material. Many materials processed by PTI require a complex
sequence of procedures in order to achieve the highest product
yields.
|
PTI RESOLUTION AND COMMITMENT TO PROCESS ANALYSIS
Following is a sequence of solutions used to improve product
yield during subsequent processing runs of the above material.
-
While the initial approach produced quality
product within customer size specifications, the processes
generated a large amount of unusable fines resulting in
a relatively poor product yield of approximately 40% of
the material received.
-
A second method of sizing involved widening
the gap in the jaw crusher, therefore producing fewer fines
at this stage. We determined the optimal gap setting through
a series of test runs in order to minimize undersize fines.
Milling pressure was also reduced by 45% in the jet mill,
lowering the energy level applied to the milling chamber,
causing less fragmentation of fine particles. This second
approach reduced fines formation significantly and improved
product yield to 54% of material received.
-
A third approach involved replacement
of the jet-mill secondary or strip air blower in order
to boost airflow through the mill classification zone.
This improvement increased classification efficiency (of
high density materials) and ultimately increased product
yield to 60% of material received. We continue to process
this material, making additional process modifications
to enhance product yield.
|